Category Archives: test-driven-development

last day at be2, my career at be2 in a sequence of words

LinkedInGoogle BuzzDZoneDiggDeliciousShare
Posted on February 11, 2011 by Narek Verdian

software engineering, java, j2ee, jboss, mysql email marketing, blacklisting, smtp, rmi, jms, crm, friends, travel, munich, specification, review, coding, esp, project management, gantt chart, matchmaking, tracking, pixels, company event, travelling, hibernate, spring, tomcat, invoker, redundancy, scalability, data complexity, performance,  partitioning, sharding, activemq, broker, soap, http call, queue, strategy, social networks, facebook, lean, agile, architecture,  scrum, scrum alliance, agile manifesto, sprint, continuous integration, hudson, static code analysis, transparency, communication, iteration, definition of done, spm, srm, user story, failure, success, confidence level, pair programming, retrospectives, groovy, grails, nosql, mongodb, rest, jersey, value stream, london, development management Continue reading →

Posted in Agile, Definition of Done, NoSQL, SCRUM, UnitTests, development, dynamic languages, groovy, pair programming, programming style, tdd, test-driven-development, value stream | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Fighting the Software Uncertainty principle. SCRUM+TDD+CI+SELENIUM+cfEngine

LinkedInGoogle BuzzDZoneDiggDeliciousShare
Posted on December 20, 2010 by Narek Verdian

“The outcome of the execution of E-type software entails a degree of uncertainty, the outcome of execution cannot be absolutely predicted”, or more fully, “Even if the outcome of past execution of an E-type program has previously been admissible, the … Continue reading →

Posted in Agile, Automated Testing, Definition of Done, SCRUM, UnitTests, checkstyle, programming style, tdd, test-driven-development | Tagged , , , , | 8 Comments

What does TDD have to offer?

LinkedInGoogle BuzzDZoneDiggDeliciousShare
Posted on November 21, 2010 by Narek Verdian

There is no difference between the notion of Test-Driven-Development and that of Test-Driven-Design; rather the former implies the later, meaning the Test-Driven-Development brings to Test-Driven-Design. The benefits of TDD are obvious, many studies have been carried out and some say … Continue reading →

Posted in UnitTests, tdd, test-driven-development, testing | Tagged , | 2 Comments